Introduction
Effective leadership has never been more important in today’s fast-changing business world. Still, there is a worrying disconnect in most organizations: 90 percent of executives think that their company’s mission also values are communicated clearly, but only 61 percent of employees agree, research from Gallup. This disconnect is more than just a breakdown in communication — it suggests that leaders may not be properly living and verbalizing the mission they are supposed to be representing. When leaders don’t truly articulate or embody the mission of an organization, the downstream effects can be significant — everything from employee morale and talent being retained, to customers being won over and pure, unadulterated results.
At Moxie Institute, we’ve seen, first-hand, the power of this transformational shift when a leader walks the talk of the mission of their organization. In our interactions with Fortune 500 execs and rising stars across sectors, we have learned to see how wielding leadership presence can make or break their organizational initiatives, employee engagement, and brand authenticity. But just what does it mean for leaders to represent a mission effectively, and how can organizations make sure their leadership team is fit to do so?
This in–depth guide covers how you can bring to life and communicate your organisation’s mission in a purposeful and authentic way with mechanics based on neuroscience, performance psychology, and communication. Whether you want to build your own leadership presence or want more mission-aligned leaders at all levels in your organization, these insights will help you change the way your mission shows up in the leadership space.
The Mission-Leadership Connection
Why Leaders Are Mission Personified
The mission of your organization is so much more than a catch phrase printed on a wall or posted to your website—it’s the heartbeat of every decision, interaction and endeavor you undertake. Leaders are the main channels through which this mission is infused into the daily function and culture. Employees turn to their managers’ behavior – not company and brand statements – to understand what is really important within an organization, according to the Journal of Business Ethics.
When your leaders walk the walk of your mission, they take abstract ideas and transform them into real things. They are the walking representation of your organization’s purpose, grounding and carrying out the principles of workplace culture. This alignment results in what psychologists call “cognitive coherence” — a state in which what people hear lines up with what they see, lowering psychological friction and fostering trust.
Leaders not only articulate the mission—they embody it in their actions, priorities and presence,” Dr. Amy Edmondson of Harvard Business School writes in her work on psychological safety. “When the stars align on this, it gives the company a strong sense of organizational integrity that both employees and customers can feel right away.
This version matters because we’re hardwired to detect when stated values and actual behavior do not line up. We process these disconnects as potential threats in our brains, leading to skepticism and disengagement. On the other hand, when leaders actually embody the mission, they trigger the reward parts of people’s brains that are related to trust and belonging, which leads to deeper levels of engagement and loyalty.
Quick Takeaways:
- Leaders serve as the living embodiment of your organization’s mission and values
- Employees look to leadership behavior, not statements, to interpret organizational priorities
- Authentic mission alignment creates cognitive coherence that builds trust and engagement
- The human brain is specifically attuned to detect inconsistencies between stated values and observed behaviors
The Costly Impact of Mission Misalignment
When leadership can’t accurately describe your mission, the damage goes deeper than the mere inconsistency of messages. Companies with lousy mission alignment among leaders suffer from 30 percent higher turnover rates and 23 percent lower productivity, according to Research from Gallup.
These are real costs the organization incurs. Based on our work at Moxie Institute, misalignment of vision usually reveals itself in three key business areas.
- Eroded Employee Trust and Engagement: When leaders fail to walk the talk of the organization’s mission, employees are disoriented and feel dissonance and disengagement of the mind. Believable leadership (or the lack thereof) Perceived leadership hypocrisy is the most powerful predictor of employee cynicism, which is directly related to decreases in engagement and increases in absenteeism, according to a Journal of Applied Psychology study.
- Watered Down Identity of the Brand: Leaders are brand champions, whether they know it or not. When their actions are not consistent with your mission, it causes confusion about what your organization is really about. This disparity undermines your competitive advantage and marketplace positioning.
- Strategic Disconnect: What ends up being even more costly is that when your leadership does not reflect your purpose or is disconnected from the mission, you have spread out priorities and everything you are doing is not tied to your primary purpose. McKinsey research finds that companies with leadership teams that are misaligned on purpose squander 20% to 30% of their strategic resources on initiatives that don’t advance their central mission.
The monetary fallout is huge. A study from the Corporate Executive Board in 2023 also found companies whose leadership had clear mission alignment outperformed their sectors by 16% in profitability, on average. Those with poor alignment, meanwhile, under-performed by 7.5%.
Executive Insight: “As someone who has led transformation at several Fortune 500 companies, I’ve learned that leaders aren’t equipped to lead a major change effort if they are not the living example of what that change is supposed to look like,” says one senior executive we coached at Moxie Institute. “You can’t delegate mission representation — it needs to be reflected in the behaviors of every leader.”
Recognizing Mission Alignment Gaps
Signs Your Leaders Aren’t Embodying Your Mission
It’s not always easy to tell where a mission misaligns, as it tends to creep up on people in small ways and then explode into a full blow problem. In our work with thousands of organizations, here are the warning signs that are consistently true that your leaders may not be doing the best job representing the purpose of your mission:
- Disconnected Decision Patterns: Leaders make decisions that favor short-term vs. long-term mission fulfillment, or Leaders repeatedly fail to refer to mission and values when explaining their strategic choices.
- Storytelling Deficiency: When leaders are posed the question “Why does your organization exist?,” they can find it challenging to articulate a compelling story that links work to the higher purpose; they fall back on anodyne corporate speak.
- Selective Value Application: Leaders apply the mission in part, while avoiding other parts that would demand uncomfortable transition or effort.
- Communication Inconsistency: Leaders describe the mission and focus of the organization in conflicting terms, and this ambiguity confuses what’s important.
- Resource Misalignment: Time, money, and focus are spent on things not so apparent as being tied to mission and values.
- “Us vs. Them” Mentality: Leaders talk about the mission as something the organization or the “top dogs” care about, rather than something they personally believe in.
- Values-Behavior Gap: A stark contrast between the values a leader acknowledges in others (the ones he/she rewards, promotes or praises) and the ones the organization has on paper.
- Mission Fatigue: You hear leaders expressing decreasing energy about talking about mission or organizational purpose, it begins to feel perfunctory vs. inspiring.
Expert Take: “Whenever we work with executive teams in our assessment work, we find the number one thing that will erode mission alignment will start with little tiny things over time,” says a senior leadership development expert at Moxie Institute. “For example,” they continue, “a leader may occasionally prioritize short-term bottom-up metrics over more mission-aligned behaviors. When this cycle goes unaddressed, it turns into a pattern that other people believe to be the ‘real priorities’ — no matter what is in the mission statement.”
Leadership Reflection Exercise:
Think about the degree of consistency your leadership team exhibits when it comes to the following mission-aligned behaviors:
- Referencing your mission when making difficult decisions
- Telling stories that connect daily work to your broader purpose
- Allocating time and resources to initiatives that directly advance your mission
- Recognizing and rewarding behaviors that exemplify your values
- Speaking about your mission with personal conviction and enthusiasm
If your leadership team isn’t demonstrating these behaviors on a regular basis, it probably means you’re left facing gaps in mission alignment.
Conducting a Leadership-Mission Alignment Assessment
But to get past the anecdotal and actually do something actionable about your leadership team’s mission alignment, you’ll need to utilize a methodical assessment framework. Here’s a time tested approach we’ve used with clients in every sector to help you on this challenge:
Step 1: Establish Clear Mission Manifestations
Begin by stating how your mission will become visible in observable leadership behaviors. Collaborate with your executive team then answer: “If our own leaders were just perfectly living out our mission, what are the specific behaviors that you could find every single day?
For instance, if your mission is to be customer focused, then some of the correlated behaviors might be:
- Regularly spending time directly engaging with customers
- Starting meetings with customer stories or perspectives
- Evaluating decisions based on customer impact
- Prioritizing customer experience investments even when they affect short-term financials
Step 2: Implement Multi-Source Feedback
Obtaining Information from Diverse Perspectives: Multiple Approaches *Collate data through these complimentary methods:
360 Degree Mission Assessment: Modify the traditional 360 feedback to evaluate mission-aligned behaviors. Add a question to include, perhaps, “How often does this leader reference our mission in making tough decisions?” or “How is this leader behaving, as an example of our value of [specific value]?”
Mission-Focused interviews: Use semistructured interviews to collect qualitative responses on how leaders manifest the mission. Ask questions about when leaders most powerfully embody the mission, and where there are disconnections.
Observational Study: Have trained observers attend key meetings and interactions, specifically noting mission-relevant behaviors, language patterns, and decision frameworks.
Step 3: Analyze Alignment Patterns
Search for trends in the data that shows:
- Which dimensions of your mission do leaders most consistently embody?
- This is when the biggest deltas exist between stated mission and leadership’s behavior
- If unrelatedness is ubiquitous throughout the organization or if it is localized in departments or leadership levels
- Formal vs. informal alignment between what is said and done
Step 4: Create Individual and Collective Feedback Loops
Create feedback loops to enable leaders to be aware of their up-to-date mission alignment, as well as their potential areas of improvement.:
- Personal-level feedback; focusing on strengths and weaknesses.
- Discussions at the team level about collective trends, and improvement opportunities
- Company-wide visibility into leadership support with anonymized data
Pro Tip: “The most effective mission alignment assessments provide a safe place to give and receive candid feedback,” says an executive communication coach at Moxie Institute. “What we’ve learned is that if we lead off those evaluations with a very explicit statement that they’re going to be for growth, not for evaluation, the quality and authenticity of the feedback shoots through the roof.
The Neuroscience of Mission-Aligned Leadership
How the Brain Processes Authenticity
Neuroscience behind how to perceive if someone is an authentic leader gives great insight into the reason mission fit matters on a physiological level. And now cognitive neuroscience research explains how our brains are so incredibly good at sensing the mismatch between our words and our behavior.
When we see leaders in action, who act in ways that oppose what they articulate are their values or organisational mission, the brain gets a conflict-detection zap (centered on the anterior cingulate cortex, which is also in charge when we’re telling lies). This activation initiates a series of neural reactions:
- Trust Inhibition: While the amygdala processes potential threats and decreases oxytocin synthesis (the emotional connection sociologist Kevin Leathes reports is vital for trust formation and binding).
- Cognitive Strain: If the listener knows they’ve been transgressed against, but can’t acknowledge it, it creates a mismatch between what they hear and what they know, and the brain has to work exceedingly hard to reconcile the contradiction, sapping cognitive resources that would otherwise be available for useful tasks.
- Emotional Contagion Disruption: The function of our mirror neurons that allow us to synchronize emotionally with others, doesn’t work as well when we sense that someone is inauthentic, which has the effect of insulating us emotionally from leaders and their messages.
With leader authenticity, however, different neurological pathways are engaged:
- Trust Enhancement: When words are in line with behavior oxytocin levels increase enhancing social bonding and trust.
- Cognitive Fluency: Consistency equals cognitive ease — the brain doesn’t have to work to resolve the contradictions, so the leader’s message is more persuasive and easier to process.
- Motivational Activation: True mission alignment activates the brain’s reward system, especially in the ventral striatum, and this can strengthen our motivation and commitment.
That’s the neuro-calendar that explains why employees are three to four times more engaged when their leaders are seen as actually representing the company’s values, rather than just discussing them, according to research from the NeurLeadership Institute.
Research Insight: “Our neuro-imaging effects indicate that the brain discriminates literally within a split second between–are those actual or phony feelings?” said Dr. Richard Boyatzis–a professor at Case Western Reserve University. “The same rapid detection occurs with leadership behaviors that are in line with, or at odds with stated values and mission.”
Building Neural Pathways for Mission Embodiment
For those of you who are leaders who want to truly script your mission–knowing how to build the neural pathways that support regular mission alignment is vital. This is not only about learning what to say — it means developing new patterns of thought and behavior that eventually become second nature.
The Neuroscience of Habit Formation in Leadership
Studies in neuroplasticity (the brain’s capability to reorganize itself by forming new neural connections) indicate that mission-aligned leadership can be trained systematically through regular practice:
- Repetition Creates Neural Strength: The more leaders make the right decision with their mission in mind, the more positive neural pathways are reinforced until they become automatic. According to study published in Journal of Neurophysiology, it takes 30-60 days of practice for a new neural pathway to become associated in your brain.
- Emotional Tagging Enhances Retention: When mission connections happen with a positive emotional state, your brain’s hippocampus (the region that decodes complex memory formation) activates and encodes these connections even further. That’s why exceptionally stronger evidences for personal-meaning emotions lead the leaders to a mission more efficiently.
- Implementation Intentions Overcome Default Patterns: The prefrontal cortex is the home of executive function and can be pre-programmed with “if-then” plans to allow leaders to act in mission-aligned ways, even under duress.
Practical Application: The Mission Integration Protocol
Drawing on these neurological principles, we have established a protocol for leaders to enhance their mission embodiment:
- Morning Mission Priming: Start each day by reflecting on how elements of your schedule relate to the organization’s mission. This primes specific neural pathways prior to when decision scenarios actually occur.
- Decision Point Pausing: Build in a brief pause before major decision-making to ask ourselves: “How does what we’re considering relate to our mission?” This reinforces the neural pathway of decision-making centers with mission consciousness.
- Reinforcing Narrative: Consistently paint narratives that link results of work to your mission. This forms deeper emotional connections that reinforce mission-related neural pathways.
- Plan for Implementation: Develop specific plans for how you will respond when you find yourself in difficult scenarios and still need to stay true to your mission. For example: “When an employee will ask me to lower the quality to speed up the process, I would specifically tell him that we do a perfect job.”
- Reflection Cycles: Finish off each week by reflecting on the ways in which mission alignment was strong and the places that it took a hit. This metamemory process speeds up the formation of neural pathways.
Expert Insight: “Leaders sometimes believe mission alignment should just happen if they believe in the mission themselves,” says a performance psychologist who consults with Moxie Institute. “But neurologically speaking, it’s the same as acquiring any complex skill—you need to practice intentionally, get feedback and use progressive reinforcement to lay down new neural pathways.”
Core Components of Mission-Aligned Leadership
Authentic Communication
The successful representation of mission starts with the way in which leaders talk about what organizations are trying to accomplish. Real communication is more than simply repeating the mission— it is about infusing life into the mission in a way that resonates personally.
The Three Dimensions of Mission-Aligned Communication
From our work with thousands of leaders, we have found that three different dimensions of communication must be congruent for leaders in order to serve effectively as spokespeople for your mission:
Conceptual Clarity: Those in charge must be able to describe what the mission stands for in a succinct, inspiring way. This means going beyond corporate-speak to articulate purpose in words that have emotional and intellectual resonance.
Personal Connection: Leaders who communicate effectively foster the sense that everyone is involved in the mission due to the leader’s personal connection to it. This means sharing why they believe in the mission personally and why it affects them and their own choices and actions.
Contextual Relevance: For each unique team, role, and situation, they must translate what the overarching mission means more specifically. That is to say, by helping people make sense of how the work they do every day fits into the bigger picture.
According to a study by Harvard Business Review, the high x-treme leader moves team performance 55% higher than those who merely excel at conceptual clarity without personal connection or contextual relevance.
Building Your Mission Communication Toolkit
To facilitate truthful mission communication, cultivate these indispensable instruments:
- Your Mission Origin Story: A brief, compelling narrative about how you personally connected with the organization’s mission and why it matters to you.
- Mission-to-Action Translations: Specific examples that illustrate how abstract mission concepts manifest in concrete decisions and behaviors.
- Team Relevance Maps: Clear articulations of how each team member’s role contributes to mission fulfillment, tailored to individual strengths and responsibilities.
- Mission Decision Frameworks: Explicit criteria for how the mission influences decision-making in different contexts, making values-based reasoning transparent.
Try It Yourself: The Personal Mission Connection Exercise
To deepen your genuine connection with your organization’s mission:
- Write down your organization’s mission statement.
- Reflect on a specific moment when you personally experienced the impact or importance of this mission. What happened? How did it affect you?
- Identify three specific ways this mission has influenced your own leadership decisions in the past month.
- Practice articulating a 60-second response to: “Why does this mission matter to you personally?”
- Ask a trusted colleague for feedback on how authentically you communicate about the mission.
This practice conditions your brain to draw lines between your personal narrative and the mission of the organization to which you are trying to connect, thus increasing the authenticity and impact of your communication.
Value-Based Decision Making
How leaders make decisions is one of the most apparent means by which they either reinforce or undermine your organization’s mission. Decision-Making Go to value- based decision making, laying out explicitly how decision can be based on mission and values.
The Decision Alignment Framework
In our practice of executive coaching, however, we have developed a step-by-step process for value-based decision making that ensures mission alignment:
- Explicit Value Identification: Explicitly identify which values and mission elements are at play in the decision at hand before you rate your alternatives.
- Option-Value Mapping: Determine how the options fit the values Create a “mission alignment score” for each option with respect to each value.
- Trade-Off Transparency: If it’s a choice between two good things (innovation vs. stability, for example), make visible the decision-making process instead of pretending you’re going to be able to honor both sides since nothing is free and you must provide evidence of how and why you’re choosing.
- Decision Communication: In announcing decisions, clearly link a choice back to mission fulfillment, thereby demonstrating the significance of values in the decision making process.
McKinsey & Company’s research finds that organisations that employ structured value-based decision frameworks achieve 22% higher strategic alignment between leadership teams, together with much higher trust in leadership among employees.
Real-World Application
Read more of his work on Encideo here: A rulebook for moral values reflected hereLook at what may be different decisions when made through a value-oriented framework:
Scenario: A cost-saving measure would potentially strengthen short-term financials but could affect the customer experience.
Traditional Approach: Assess on financial terms above all; customer experience is a secondary afterthought.
Value-Based Approach: If customer-centeredness is an underlying fabric of your mission, start by evaluating the customer impact and if that compromise to customer experience is acceptable based on expected financial returns.
This might sound wishy-washy, but it actually changes what gets priority in the decision. Slowly over time, these priorities become obvious to everyone in the organization, either supporting or undermining your mission.
What experts say: “The most mission-aligned leaders we see through our work reflect their organization’s values without even thinking about it — that is, they’re wired to run decisions through the filter of their values,” says a leadership development specialist with the Moxie Institute. “But it’s not a natural process — it has to be an informed effort to actually practices, to make that connection between values and decisions explicit and deliberate.
Consistent Behavioral Modeling
Leaders also demonstrate what actually matters in your organization with every day-to-day behavior—far more than with any words or decisions they make. They practice what they preach: Agreeableness and honesty simply won’t do—boards need to see the proof; you consistently behave in ways that display the mission of the organization, and won’t compromise under pressure or when no one seems to be watching.
The Behavioral Consistency Challenge
According to a study by the Center for Creative Leadership, 65% of employees see their leaders behave in ways that conflict with their “organizational values”. This behavioral gap is what psychologists refer to as an “integrity gap,” which erodes trust and engagement.
The most common scenarios where leaders’ behaviors drift from mission alignment include:
- Under Pressure: When facing tight deadlines, financial constraints, or crisis situations
- In Private Settings: How leaders behave in smaller meetings versus public forums
- Regarding Status: How leaders treat people at different organizational levels
- With Resources: How leaders allocate their own time, attention, and organizational resources
- Through Rewards: What behaviors leaders recognize, promote, and celebrate
Building Behavioral Congruence
To add more robust behavior modeling to your mission:
- Identify Mission-Critical Behaviors: Determine 3-5 direct and observable behaviors that best exemplify each core value in your mission.
- Establish Behavioral Commitments: Get your leaders to agree they’ll commit to these behaviors send it out to their team so that there is accountability.
- Implement Peer Observation: Create a system where members of the leadership team observe and feedback to other members specifically on the behaviors that align with the mission.
- Create pressure-testing scenarios: Simulate and role-play how to maintain mission alignment in tough circumstances.
- Implement Behavioral Nudges: Establish contextual reminders and cues that encourage mission-consistent acts in decision moments.
Leadership Story: “One company we did work with, ‘respect for all stakeholders’ was one of their values, yet at their a top leadership meeting, some of their fairly new team members were regularly interrupted and their ideas were shot down by more of the tenured executives on the team,” shares a Moxie Institute coach. “We had a straightforward intervention that anyone could use, a small bell that was rung whenever someone was interrupted. This tangible catalyst altered meeting dynamics within weeks and in time changed the overall culture of communication.
Quick Takeaways:
- It’s leaders’ everyday actions, not speeches or slogans, that create an organization’s culture
- The degree of correspondence of behavior is best tested in pressure and unsupervised situations.
- Clear, observable behaviors should be created for each core value
- Peer observation and feedback encourage faster alignment to behaviors that support the mission.
- Environmental supports can sustain behavioral stability
Emotional Intelligence and Mission Connection
Emotional attachment to your organization’s mission — and being the kind of leader who helps others become emotionally attached — is a vital component of mission-driven leadership. The nexus of this connection is emotional intelligence (EI) that allows leaders to identify, comprehend and appropriately connect with the emotions of purposeful work.
The Emotional Dimensions of Mission
Yale Center for Emotional Intelligence researchers have shown that organizational missions work by appealing not just to people’s rational sides but also to emotional ones:
- Rational Dimension: Why the mission is important and how it drives value.
- Emotional Dimension: The emotions the mission stirs and the way it is tied to more profound human needs and dreams
Leaders who rank well in emotional intelligence do an amazing job of connecting those dimensions, allowing people to connect intellectually as well as emotionally with the organizational purpose. Importantly, this emotional element is essential– research finds that emotional connection to a mission is 2.5 times more predictive of discretionary effort than rational knowledge alone.
Four EI Components for Mission Alignment
For enhancing emotional dimensions of mission representation, leaders may therefore cultivate the four dimensions of emotional intelligence:
Self-Awareness: Becoming more aware of your personal emotional relationship to the mission, what makes you energized about aspects of it, and what could feel less personally meaningful.
Self-Management: Regulating your emotional expression to reflect engagement in mission. Even in tough times, a leader must express high 3 characteristic enthusiasm, without playing fake.
Social Awareness: Knowing how team members relate emotionally to different aspects of the mission, and understanding what the community barriers might be to their engagement.
Relationship Management: Helping foster deeper emotional connection with mission in others using personalized methods that respect their values and aspirations.
Applied EI in Mission Communication
For emotionally intelligent leaders, they tailor their messaging about a mission to their audience’s emotions. For example:
- When they detect concern in the interviewee’s answer, they validate concerns before presenting their own certainty.
- They stand and leave room for others to communicate the same way by showing their passion.
- When they see clouds of confusion, they translate abstract mission concepts into concrete instances
- When their voices are silent, they create personal missions that make the mission theirs
Development Strategy: “We’ve discovered that executive presence and emotional intelligence are inextricably linked,” says a trainer for Moxie Institute. “If you can be totally present, listen to what is not being said, and respond authentically, you create a very powerful tool in creating emotional connections through the mission of the organization.”
Common Roadblocks to Mission Alignment
Addressing Misalignment Challenges
Despite the most noble intentions, there are certain forces at work that prevent mission from reaching leadership behavior whether a leader’s words and actions are aligned with company mission. It is important to identify and overcome these common obstacles to further mission alignment.
Primary Mission Alignment Obstacles
From our work with thousands of leaders across disciplines, here are the most common obstacles to effective mission representation:
Mission Abstraction: Organizations are forever spouting mission statements in vague, general terms, and leaders find it difficult to translate them into specific behaviors and decisions. This separation creates a strong disjuncture between what purpose-driven leadership is about and what day-to-day leadership looks like.
Competing priorities: Leaders must often navigate the tensions between short-term performance pressures and longer-term mission realization. When we don’t have articulated frameworks to manage these tensions, more immediate pressures tend to trump the mission.
Incentive Misalignment: When the reward system (compensation, recognition, promotion) fails to clearly value those very mission-aligned behaviors, leaders get mixed messages about what’s really important, especially when financial incentives are at odds with espoused values.
Skill Gaps: While many leaders intellectually ‘get’ the mission, they simply did not have the skills necessary to be able to embody or share it in a way that was effective — specifically the skills of storytelling, genuine communication, and emotional intelligence.
Cultural Inheritance: Anchored routines, norms and “unwritten rules” of organizations can operate against new mission aspirations, especially if these cultural features were formed in another era or under other strategic or leadership priorities.
Strategic Solutions for Common Roadblocks
With these barriers in mind, focused interventions can help leaders surmount mission alignment challenges:
For Mission Abstraction:
- Develop some kind of “mission translation guide” that explicitly links abstract mission language to specific actions and choices
- Create scenarios for use that highlight the utilisation of values in everyday leadership-related situations, to suit the context of the mission.
- Set aside regular mission reflection time where the leadership relay explicit cases of mission being fulfilled
For Competing Priorities:
- Set clear decision hierarchies which unambiguously prioritise mission-critical values
- Develop “mission impact assessments” of big decisions that may divide short-term gain from mission alignment
- Create peer coaching templates that concentrate on managing competing priorities AND staying true to your mission
For Incentive Misalignment:
- Audit: formal, and informal reward systems to reduce the disconnect between what is said at the organizational level (goals and values) and what is rewarded.
- Introduce recognition programs that recognize mission-aligned leadership behavior
- Tuning objective function evaluation criteria to explicitly incorporate mission matching measures
For Skill Gaps:
- Offer specific leadership and communication training in storytelling, authentic communications, and emotional intelligence.
- Develop mentoring dyads, that tie capable mission embodies with those wanting to be improved
- Create “mission message labs” where leaders practice articulating the connection to mission and receive expert feedback
For Cultural Legacy:
- Perform a cultural audit to unearth particular norms which work for or against mission alignment.
- Develop specific “from/to” explanations of cultural change needed for accomplishing the mission
- Socialize informal culture and mobilize cultural leaders to change legacy norms
Leadership Reflection: “One of the most powerful questions we ask exec teams is: ‘What are the behaviors you are currently rewarding that might actually work against your stated mission? “ says a consultant for the Moxie Institute. “This single question tends to expose some pretty deep rifts between what organizations say they value and what they’re actually programmatically protecting,” he said.
Overcoming Implementation Obstacles
Once theoretical solutions are identified, leaders need to address pragmatic challenges of advancing mission alignment. These logistical hurdles frequently decide whether good will gets turned into meaningful action.
Common Implementation Barriers
Drawing on our work guiding mission alignment effort, here are some of the practical barriers that are most likely to sink implementation:
- Attention Dilution: There is a limited amount of leadership time and focus, and mission alignment efforts are often in competition with many other organizational priorities, often being overshadowed by the day-to-day demands of running the business.
- Measurement Challenge: Unlike financial levers, measuring mission alignment may be difficult to do in a quantifiable manner, making it harder to track and celebrate progress.
- Psychological Defences: Due to discomfort that arises when leaders are asked to consider that there may be a disconnect between their actions and the organization’s values, defensive responses can ensue.
- Cascading Consistency: Getting mission alignment right from the senior team to middle managers is one of the bigger challenges, because middle management is under a lot of operational pressure.
- Sustaining Momentum: Even when we have gotten buy-in, silence can be deafening.
Practical Implementation Strategies
For each adoption barrier, the following tactics can help organizations keep driving change:
For Attention Dilution:
- Embed mission-aligned practices in existing leadership practices rather than creating something new.
- Establish brief “mission moments” in standing meetings to help with focus and the utilization of time.
- Design visual cues to keep missions top of mind in both physical and digital work environments
For Measurement Difficulties:
- Develop qualitative and quantitative indicators only for mission fit
- Roll out ongoing “pulse surveys” to check in on how well employees feel their leaders are aligned with the mission
- Build mission alignment dashboards – see picture of what’s alike and aligned and progress across various dimensions
For Psychological Resistance:
- Present situational mission alignment in the sense of a community learning and growing together.Guiding the mission work as a community journey of growth, not an evaluation.
- Instil psychological safety through discussions led by senior leaders about their own alignment challenges
- Get professional facilitation for sensitive feedback conversations on alignment gaps
For Cascading Consistency:
- Supply middle managers with easy-to-use instruments to embed mission alignment in their day-by-day leadership profile
- Establish peer learning communities for managers to exchange practical tactics for mission alignment.
- Identify and commend specific instances of mission-consistent leadership at all levels in the organization.
For Sustaining Momentum:
- Define quarterly mission alignment review meetings to recommit and share progress
- Establish “mission alignment team” of rotating membership to see it through.
- Bake mission alignment into quarterly business reviews with the same level of detail we do our operational measures
Implementation Insight: “The organizations that execute mission alignment most successfully don’t address it as a discreet initiative,” says a Moxie Institute executive coach. “They don’t tack it on as an item on a ‘to do list,’” she continued, “they literally build it into the way you already run things — every meeting structure, decision process, recognition system and leadership behaviors.” This meld of processes markedly improves the sustainability.”
Developing Mission-Aligned Leaders
Training Strategies That Work
Training leaders in a way that works in the field is a systematic process that must not be ignored, and is indeed a very integral part, for successful representation of your mission. Those best practices which are drawn from (adult) learning theory and our work with thousands of leaders, have reliably led to significant improvements in mission alignment:
Experiential Learning for Mission Embodiment
Conventional mission training is conceptual and does not necessarily lead to behavior modification. Instead, it offers experiential learning which generates intellectual and emotional linkages — unites the heart with the head:
- Mission-Critical Scenarios: Deep, simulations in which leaders practice how to steer through tough situations and still stay on mission. These conditions should represent real-world pressures to try mission commitment.
- Value-Based Decision Laboratories: Structured exercises in which leaders use mission criteria to analyze challenging decisions and get immediate feedback on alignment from peers and facilitators.
- Mission Storytelling Workshops: Interactive workshops in which leaders craft, practice, and perfect personal stories that link the organization’s purpose to their values and experience.
- Behavioral Modeling Observation: Architected exposure to two best-in-class mission-aligned leaders in ‘the moment of truth’ coupled with coached reflection supported by good examples of demonstration of mission.
- Stakeholder Perspective Immersions: Programs that insert the leader into the perspective of key stakeholders (customers, employees, community members) to gain an empathetic understanding of the difference a mission makes.
Research-Backed Training Design Principles
For optimal learning transfer, mission aligned training should include the following design elements based on research:
- Spaced Learning : dividing training across several short sessions distributed over time rather than one or two intense courses
- Practice: Offering numerous chances to practice targeted mission-consistent conduct with feedback from a coach
- Social Learning: Fosters a peer coaching mindset and keeps the training aligned to your mission between formal training opportunities
- Contextual Application: Application back to the leaders’ work context straight away.
- Metacognitive Reflection: Constructing a Metacognitive Reflection Guide for Leaders about Their Own Mission Alignment Learning.
Training Customization Factors
Mission training is only effective with relevant organizational context and leadership needs:
- Mission Maturity: The extent to which the mission is already embedded in the operation of the organization
- Level of Leadership: Systems for executives, middle managers, and up-and-coming leaders
- The Industry Context: The various forms of mission across differing industries and business models
- Culture: Flexing styles of work while still respecting the current culture and yet socializing change
- Strategic Priorities: Making mission training meet business where it is today
Expert Commentary: Best mission alignment training conceptually mitigates the ‘last mile problem’ in leadership development,” says a Moxie Institute lead facilitator. “It’s not just that you understand the mission intellectually or are committed to it emotionally. “Potentially everybody at a place like yours knows how to balance their life and career, but very few leaders have the practical tools to translate that agreement and alignment into actual behaviors — especially when it’s time to make trade-offs against competing priorities or when high-pressure moments happen.”
Mission Incarnation Coaching
Training delivers critical skills and awareness, while coaching delivers sustained focus and accountability that produces lasting behavior change. Mission alignment executive coaching supports leaders to weave the mission into their unique, personally meaningful leadership style.
The Mission Alignment Coaching Model
Through hundreds of executive coaching clients, we have created a tailored method for mission embodiment coaching:
- Mission Personality Assessment: Discovering how the leader’s native strengths, values, and communication style can naturally manifest the mission of the organization.
- Alignment Gap Analysis: Asking key stakeholders for their input on what they can do behaviorally to support and undermine alignment to mission.
- Personal Mission Translation: Building the leader’s personal clarity on what each element of mission looks like within their specific remit.
- Behavioral Objectives: Specific and observable changes in behavior that will show improved alignment to mission.
- Implementation Support: Real-time coaching for critical meetings, presentations, and decision making to reinforce mission-aligned behavior.
- Reflection & Refinement: Developing formalized feedback loops for reviewing progress, refining approaches, and building deeper mission integration.
Coaching Techniques for Mission Alignment
Great mission-alignment coaches use specific tactics to help leaders “feel” the organization’s purpose:
- Values Clarification: We work to find common ground between personal values and organizational purposes where there is genuine alignment.
- Cognitive Reframing: Assisting leaders in understanding and altering thought patterns that lead to misalignments between personal values and the organization’s direction.
- Design of Deliberate Practice: developing custom practice for mission-critical communication and decision situations.
- Shadow Coaching: Watching leaders during their work and giving on-the-spot feedback based on how well their actions align with the mission.
- Story Development: Assisting leaders in shaping and honing stories about themselves that link their leadership path to the mission of the organization.
A Mission-Aligned Success Story:
“We coached the CEO of a healthcare system who could talk about being ‘patient-centered’ from an intellectual perspective, but had a hard time showing up that way in how he lead,” a Moxie Institute executive coach says. “We found as part of our coaching that because of her financial background, she naturally was looking at efficiency metrics and not the patient experience.
“We created tailored rituals that included weekly patient story sessions and ‘mission impact’ questions for her executive team meetings. “Within three months of this intervention, her leadership team reported remarkable change in her consistent representation of the patient-centered mission, and mission alignment for the senior staff improved substantially on employee engagement scores,” they write.
Creating Accountability Systems
For mission alignment to be more than lip service, organizations require accountability frameworks that keep the mission front and center and offer continuous feedback. This helps make mission a constant rather than (just) a sometime-thing.
Structured Accountability Frameworks
Theoretically, strongly matching missions could lead organizations to adopt several, mutually reinforcing accountability structures:
- Mission Alignment Reviews – periodic (quarterly or monthly) structured conversations conducted with a focus on how leadership behaviors and decisions have driven the mission forward.
- Peer Accountability Partnerships: One-on-one relationships between leaders who give consistent, mission-aligned, feedback to each other.
- Stakeholder Feedback Mechanisms: Systematic gathering of feedback from staff, consumers, and other stakeholders regarding alignment with the leadership mission.
- Mission Metrics Dashboard: Visual and visual stimuli for tracking of clearly definable, quantifiable mission-aligned leadership behaviors and results.
- Values-Based Recognition Systems:Official mechanisms to recognize, celebrate, and reward excellent expression of the mission.
Implementing Effective Feedback Loops
The quality of feedback shapes mission alignment effectiveness. It’s having these things in common that make fantastic feedback systems:
- Specificity: Addressing specific behaviors instead of global impressions
- Perspective Balance: Both positives & Opportunity for improvement recognition
- Psychological Safety: Making it okay to tell each other the truth.
- Forward Orientation: Emphasizing future improvement rather than past criticism
- Regular Cadence: Providing consistent, predictable feedback opportunities
“An especially successful tactic we’ve utilized is forming ‘Mission Advisory Boards’ made of a mix of people from all levels of the organization,” says a leadership development specialist at Moxie Institute. “These boards meet quarterly with senior leaders in order to provide direct feedback on mission alignment. “The power of those boards is to bring voices at the table that the leaders wouldn’t normally hear from and that creates for quite powerful accountability beyond just traditional hierarchy.”
Practical Application: The Mission Alignment Scorecard
A structured scorecard provides consistent measurement of leadership mission alignment. It typically includes:
- Behavioral Indicators: Observable leadership actions that demonstrate mission alignment
- Decision Alignment: Assessment of how major decisions reflected mission priorities
- Communication Consistency: Evaluation of how messaging reinforced mission elements
- Resource Allocation: Analysis of how time, attention, and budget aligned with mission
- Stakeholder Perceptions: Feedback from key groups about leadership mission representation
These scorecard elements can be rated through self-assessment, peer input, stakeholder polling and objective measures to get a 360-degree view of progress toward mission alignment.
Quick Takeaways:
- Agree accountability mechanisms for sustaining a mission-linked focus
- Effective accountability is the result of several, complementary mechanisms
- Feedback itself should be specific, balanced, psychologically safe, and future-oriented.
- Powerful Accountability Mission Advisory Boards that include stakeholders from different sectors provide powerful accountability.
- Structured scorecards offer a verifiable measurement to assess alignment with a leader’s mission
Measuring Mission Alignment Success
Key Performance Indicators
Effective measurement of mission fit necessitates a blend of quantitative and qualitative measures that give a holistic picture of the progress. The most enlightened measurements use both leading measures (predictors of future compliance) and lagging measures (lagging evidence of past compliance).
Core Mission Alignment Metrics
Given studies and our own work with highly-aligned organizations, these are the most useful metrics:
- Mission Clarity Index: The portion of the organization’s team and empowered customers who could accurately explain what the organization’s mission is and how their role relates to it (goal: 85%+)
- Leadership Behavior Alignment Score: A methodical calculation of the extent to which leadership behaviors reflect core mission elements (assessed from 360-degree feedback)
- Decision Alignment Ratio: The proportion of material decisions that explicitly referenced mission-related criterion in the decision-making process (target: 80%+)
- Mission-Critical Resource Allocation: Percent of budget and leadership time discretionary allocated to advancing motions priorities directly
- Mission Momentum Measure: Degree to which employees think the organization is moving toward or away from its espoused purpose over time
- Gap in Values-Behavior: Measures perceived gap between what leaders say versus what leaders do (target: down-trend)
- Mission Engagement Score: Effective emotional connection of the individual contributors to the organization’s mission (based on engagement surveys provided by employees)
Implementation Approach
For organizations first starting out in measuring alignment to their mission, we suggest the following trajectory:
Phase 1: Baseline Assessment
- Take initial readings in all the readings to find out the present level of alignment.
- Find the 2-3 metrics with the largest initial focus alignment gaps
- Set realistic improvement objectives using industry standards and your unique internal situation
Phase 2: Integration with Existing Metrics
- Integrate certain mission alignment measures into periodic business reviews and dashboards
- Establish visible means of tracking things that keep the organization informed
- Tie mission metrics to operational and financial metrics to show links
Phase 3: Comprehensive Measurement System
- Scale up to full M&E suite of all indicators
- Develop function specific alignment metrics for each department
- Build predictive analytics that can detect leading indicators of potential misalignment
Performance Psychology Insight: “The biggest strength is in the conversations that get created through the measurements, not the measurements themselves,” says a performance psychologist who consults with Moxie Institute clients. “As leadership teams talk about specific alignment metrics, they will naturally be paying closer attention to behaviors and decisions that enhance those measurements.
Feedback Mechanisms That Drive Improvement
Beyond defining the metrics, organizations require structured feedback mechanisms to convert measurements to real improvements. These mechanisms guarantee that mission alignment data becomes a tool for change, and not simply added to one of many external reporting demands.
Effective Feedback Frameworks
Behavioral Change Psychology research indicates that feedback loops are most effective when they contain these elements:
- Tangibility: Giving actionable, rather than abstract advice on how to behave (e.g., “This is what you do when relationship breaks down”).
- Psychological Safety: Creating environments where leaders can acknowledge alignment gaps without fear of judgment or negative consequences
- Positive Reinforcement: Reinforcing positives, celebrating progress and strengths and identifying areas for improvement
- Contextual relevance: Relating the feedback directly to the leaders’ current challenges and duties rather than general principles
- Peer Learning: Promote sharing of best practices between leaders in order to advance the whole system improvement effort.
Innovative Feedback Approaches
These innovative feedback mechanisms are being implemented by stellar mission-aligned organizations:
Mission Alignment Circles: Small cohorts of 10-12 leaders who gather monthly to discuss challenges, successes and tactics (what’s mission-relevant?)
Instant Alignment Coaching: Observers that give on-the-spot feedback at critical meetings and presentations on mission aligned behaviors
Mission Impact Storytelling: Formal chances for stakeholders to tell of how leadership behaviors have helped or hindered their experience of the organisational mission
Values-Based After-Action Reviews: Reviews that assess how leadership actions and decisions demonstrated organizational values both on and after a project is completed
Mission Mentor Networks: Pairing mission-aligned leaders with those looking to be better, building developmental relationships that are focused on authentic mission representation
Feedback in Action: “One of the hospital systems we’ve been working with is holding ‘Mission Alignment Rounds’, based on the idea of drug rounds, says a Moxie Institute consultant. “Every other week, their exec team tours various departments, specifically to observe and feedback how their leadership behaviors are facilitating their (staff) patient centered mission. “Structured observations have hugely expedited mission alignment throughout the company.”
Action Plan: Strengthening Mission Alignment
Transforming mission alignment requires a systematic approach that builds steady momentum over time. This action plan provides a structured pathway to strengthen how leaders represent your mission, with specific steps for immediate, near-term, and sustained impact.
Phase 1: Foundation Building (Months 1-2)
- Conduct Mission Alignment Assessment
- Implement a comprehensive evaluation of current leadership mission alignment
- Gather multi-source feedback from employees, customers, and other key stakeholders
- Identify specific alignment gaps and priority improvement opportunities
- Create Mission Behavior Guide
- Define 3-5 observable behaviors that demonstrate each core value in your mission
- Develop specific examples of these behaviors in different contexts and situations
- Create clear distinctions between exceptional, acceptable, and misaligned behaviors
- Establish Leadership Commitment
- Conduct mission alignment workshops with senior leadership team
- Have each leader create personal mission alignment commitments
- Publicly share these commitments to create accountability
Phase 2: Capability Development (Months 3-6)
- Implement Leadership Training
- Develop mission-specific communication skills through structured workshops
- Create decision simulation exercises that reinforce mission-aligned choices
- Provide storytelling training to enhance mission narrative capabilities
- Launch Coaching Initiative
- Provide specialized coaching for leaders showing significant alignment gaps
- Create peer coaching partnerships focused on mission embodiment
- Develop internal coaching capacity for sustainable support
- Create Accountability Systems
- Implement regular mission alignment reviews in existing meeting structures
- Develop mission alignment metrics dashboard for ongoing tracking
- Establish feedback channels for real-time alignment input
Phase 3: Cultural Integration (Months 7-12)
- Align Organizational Systems
- Revise recognition and reward programs to reinforce mission-aligned behaviors
- Integrate mission alignment criteria into hiring and promotion processes
- Modify performance reviews to include mission representation assessment
- Develop Mission Ambassadors
- Identify and empower informal leaders who strongly embody the mission
- Create opportunities for these ambassadors to influence broader organization
- Establish ambassador communities for sharing effective practices
- Implement Ongoing Reinforcement
- Create regular mission impact storytelling opportunities in meetings and communications
- Establish quarterly mission alignment “pulse checks” to maintain awareness
- Develop mission-specific leadership development resources
Immediate Next Steps
To launch this initiative effectively:
- Executive Alignment Session: Schedule a half-day workshop with your senior leadership team to build shared understanding of mission alignment importance and approach.
- Assessment Design: Develop a customized mission alignment assessment tailored to your specific organizational mission and values.
- Quick-Win Identification: Select 2-3 high-visibility opportunities to demonstrate mission-aligned leadership within the next 30 days.
- Communication Planning: Create a transparent communication approach to share the mission alignment initiative with the broader organization.
Professional Development Suggestion: “Organizations serious about strengthening mission alignment should consider providing specialized executive communication coaching for their senior leadership team,” recommends a Moxie Institute executive coach. “The ability to authentically articulate and embody your mission is fundamentally a communication skill that can be developed with expert guidance.”
Frequently Asked Questions
What is mission-aligned leadership?
The daily practice of the company mission and values message coming through in the leader’s spoken word, printed matter, and behavior. It is one thing to know about or to talk about the mission, and quite another to act it out. A leader whose behavior is aligned with their mission, and therefore with their team’s expectations, creates cognitive coherence: Leaders who practice what they preach generate higher trust, more engagement, and better results, according to a study by Harvard Business School.
How do I know if my leaders are doing an effective job representing our mission?
Some of the telltale signs of good mission representation include the following:
- Leaders naturally look to the mission to explain the rationales for decisions and priorities.
- They share engaging stories that tie the day-to-day to the bigger picture
- Their investment (time, attention, and budget) reflects the priorities of their mission.
- They also acknowledge and demonstrate behaviors that model company values
- Surveys of employees reflect high degrees of agreement with statements such as “Our leadership team regularly behaves in a way that reflects our values.”
- Leaders can clarify how the mission is reflected in their respective thinking with concrete examples
- They stay mission-focused even on a bad day or under pressure.
When these behaviors are not consistently in evidence, you may have room to make mission alignment more robust.
What’s the difference between understanding a mission and embodying it?
Intellectually grasping a mission is an exercise — you need to know what the words mean and be prepared to state them to others. Living the mission means incorporating it into your identity and actions. The divergence takes various forms:
- To know is to understand what the mission is; and to live is to demonstrate it in a repeatedly experienced behavior.
- When you understand, then you can explain the mission to others; when you embody, then you inspire others based on what the mission has done through you.
- Understanding exists in the cognitive realm; embodying engages both intellect and emotion
- Grasping can be instantaneous; becoming is a function of slow practice
- Understanding is lonely, and embodying is weaving all of this into every part of leadership
- Leaders who are the mission (not just knowing the mission) lead teams that are four times more engaged — findings from the NeuroLeadership Institute.
How does mission alignment impact business results?
Time and again, we see that strong mission alignment leads to tangible business results:
- Financial Performance: According to the Corporate Executive Board, organizations with a high degree of mission alignment outperform peers by 12-15% on long-term financial measures.
- Employee Retention: 30% less voluntary turnover in mission-aligned companies, especially high performers, according to Deloitte studies.”
- Customer Retention: Forrester Research shows that companies with leadership teams that align with its mission have 23% higher customer retention rates.
- Innovation: Companies with mission-driven employees see successful innovations rise 22% more compared to those that aren’t, and researchers credit this to increased employee discretionary effort and taking of risk.
- Operation Efficiency: Decision friction is lowered if you have mission clarity—in fact, 25% of aligned teams make decisions faster than those with mission confusion.
These boosts in performance are due to the fact that mission alignment drives trust, possible levels of engagement, collaboration and purposeful effort on 70%+ of an organization.
What are the biggest barriers to mission alignment, and how can they be overcome?
According to our work with thousands of organizations, those are the prevailing obstacles to mission alignment, and here’s what I imagine we all should do about it:
Barrier 1: Jargon and Overgeneralization Language Solution: Develop a guide to translate mission, connecting high-order purpose statements to specific behaviors and decisions in a variety of contexts.
Barrier 2: Short-Term Pressure vs. Long-Term MissionSolution: Facilitiate making tension explicit and provide constructs for making tough decisions that acknowledge that some times do not call for a short-term fix, and then offer some options and decision heuristics.
Barrier 3: Misaligned Incentives Solution: Auditing and adjusting platforms of recognition and compensation that reinforce mission aligned behaviors instead of working against them.
Barrier 4: Leadership Skill Gaps Solution: Address skill gaps required for embodying mission face-to-face, particularly communication and decision making skills, through targeted skill building.
Barrier 5: Legacy Cultural Norms Solution: Articulate legacy behaviors that between company mission alignment and establish specific “from/to” shifts led by visible senior leadership.
How should mission alignment be measured?
Mission Alignment Measurement that Works It’s a mix of methods that gets the job done.
- Behavioral Assessment: Judging the extent to which leaders model mission-consistent behaviors through a 360-degree feedback system.
- Decision Analysis: Analysis of Key Decisions to Determine Mission Impact
- Resource Alignment: Monitoring how budgeting, time and attention allocated are consistent with the mission agenda.
- Stakeholder Perception: if you ask employees, customers and other stakeholders if leadership was on your mission agenda?
- Narrative Consistency: Evaluating how consistently leaders communicate about the mission across different contexts
A well-balanced perspective on measurement incorporates both quantitative measures (e.g., survey scores, or resource allocation percentages) and qualitative data sources (e.g., stakeholder interviews, narrative examination).
How can executive presence training improve mission alignment?
Executive presence coaching on its own directly improves mission alignment in a number of important ways:
- Real Talk: Growing in the ability to speak with personal passion and authentic bonding about the Mission
- Behavioral Resilience: Developing the resilience to enact mission-vital actions even when under pressure or examination.
- Nonverbal congruence: Making sure that body language, tone of voice and facial expression reinforce rather than contradict mission messages.
- Adaptive Messaging: Developing the ability to translate the mission for any audience while maintaining its vital essence
- Personal-Organizational Fit: Guiding leaders to find purposeful alignment between their personal values and organizational mission
Executive presence is about 25% of what senior leaders think about when determining whether or not their mission was well represented, according to research from the Center for Talent Innovation.
What role does storytelling play in mission-aligned leadership?
Tell a story Storytelling can play a crucial role in mission-aligned leadership in a number of ways:
- Making Mission Tangible: Stories translate vague septuagenarian hippie ideals and reasons for being into vivid, picture-of-it examples people can see and remember.
- Creating Emotional Connection: Stories activate emotions which engage so much more deeply for concepts of mission than pure logic.
- Showcasing Priorities: The stories that leaders tell can indicate to you what they really value when it comes to the mission and what their priorities really are.
- Establishing Common Ground Through Story: Stories facilitate shared meaning, energizing the people who hear them at all levels of the organization, to help us all understand the mission in a similar way.
- Life Application: Mission stories illustrate application of values in specific situations (providing prototypes for future decisions).
A study from Harvard Business Review found that when information is relayed in the form of a story, it is up to 22x more memorable than standalone facts, which is why storytelling is such a critical tool for mission-driven leaders.
How does mission alignment differ across leadership levels?
Although mission alignment is significant at all levels of the organization, its expression varies across levels of leadership:
Executive Leadership
- Focus: Defining the company mission and being the embodiment of it organization-wide
- Primary Challenge: Balancing multiple stakeholder expectations while maintaining mission integrity
- Key Behaviors: Making high-visibility decisions that demonstrate mission priorities, shaping organizational systems to reinforce mission alignment
Middle Management
- Focus: Make mission specific and meaningful for your department (transforms)
- Primary Challenge: How to cope with operational pressures and remain mission consistent.
- Key Behaviors: Relating team goals to mission purpose, engaging mission-aligned behaviors, filtering competing priorities through the mission lens
Frontline Leadership
- Focus: “Walking the Talk” by applying our mission in all of our work and customer engagements
- Key Challenge: Relevance of mission to Task Relevance in the moment
- Key Behaviors: Offering in-the-moment coaching on the mission, celebrating missionary moments, and demonstrating alignment while making everyday choices
Effective organizations create tailored mission alignment approaches for each leadership level while maintaining consistent core values.
TAKE THE FIRST STEP TO MASTER POWERFUL NEW SKILLS
Schedule an easy 30-minute call using our using our calendar. We’re here to help!
